Jesse Ventura 2016 Petition

If not now, when? If not Jesse Ventura, who? Jesse Ventura must run for President in 2016! Let’s collect 100,000 signatures by the end of 2013 to make Governor Ventura run! Please sign our grassroots petition below.

Jesse Ventura 2016

[signature]

6,705 signatures

Share this with your friends:

   

 

Latest Signatures
6,705mayson griepApr 21, 2014
6,704bill griep jrApr 21, 2014
6,703milez griepApr 21, 2014
6,702marshall griepApr 21, 2014
6,701christine gonsalvesApr 21, 2014
6,700Tania ManzerApr 20, 2014
6,699Gloria EidtApr 20, 2014
6,698Jessee MooreApr 20, 2014
6,697jhon DuarteApr 20, 2014
6,696Jon TompkinsApr 20, 2014
6,695Jerry DowdyApr 20, 2014
6,694Nestor HernandezApr 20, 2014
6,693Cartee BrownApr 19, 2014
6,692Hector RamosApr 19, 2014
6,691Dan PriceApr 19, 2014
6,690Michael BergApr 18, 2014
6,689Hans BrinkhoffApr 18, 2014
6,688sharon smithApr 18, 2014
6,687brooklkyn hicksApr 17, 2014
6,686Frank MottoloApr 17, 2014
6,685Matthew DuaneApr 16, 2014
6,684Gabe YarbroughApr 16, 2014
6,683Joey GarciaApr 16, 2014
6,682David RoutledgeApr 16, 2014
6,681Bjartur VestApr 15, 2014
6,680Donald FulghumApr 15, 2014
6,679Johnny LucasApr 15, 2014
6,678Carl Frady IIIApr 15, 2014
6,677Emile HarmelApr 14, 2014
6,676Mohammed HarmelApr 14, 2014
6,675Arik OroszApr 14, 2014
6,674Kenneth TanigawaApr 14, 2014
6,673Buck MurrayApr 13, 2014
6,672cody rockholdApr 13, 2014
6,671Jorge YbanezApr 13, 2014
6,670Rob FortuneApr 13, 2014
6,669Bob gilbertApr 13, 2014
6,668THOMAS STEPHENApr 13, 2014
6,667John DoeApr 13, 2014
6,666Curtis GodbeyApr 13, 2014
6,665Clarissa DeLeoneApr 13, 2014
6,664William DeLeoneApr 13, 2014
6,663Kurt HausauerApr 12, 2014
6,662Tonya MillerApr 12, 2014
6,661Joe SoncekApr 12, 2014
6,660Zachary FranceApr 12, 2014
6,659Christine StoughtonApr 11, 2014
6,658Roberto MadrigalApr 11, 2014
6,657Colin RasmussenApr 11, 2014
6,656Yanina RomeroApr 11, 2014

Comments

Jesse Ventura 2016 Petition — 745 Comments

  1. I have watched and listened to this mans thoughts and talk shows he’s been on and I’m 56 years old there’s not a doubt in my mind that nobody is qualified to be there more than him but I truly don’t think our votes matter anymore at one time it did but ever since 1963 the U.S has had puppets in a chair that military wants in there and if they think that they can make a difference the military will show and remind them the Abraham Supruter film

  2. If you think that writing on Twitter, ‘I can not think my life is
    now it sucks. i – Like, formerly known as My Music on Facebook, might be
    the most popular Phrasebook music player application available.
    How do you learn “the right way” to advertise with Facebook.

  3. Say a silent prayer for lost souls who can no longer speak for themselves.
    Kensei’s zanpakut is named Tachikaze and may be
    also introduced producing utilization of the command “Blow”.
    My brother and I had an older cousin who bequeathed
    her childhood collection of Peter Pan records to us several years after she outgrew them.
    While Wrestle Mania 3 will always be remembered for Hulk Hogan vs.
    The vendors were for the most part friendly
    and willing to answer questions without pressuring us
    to buy. I especially enjoyed Ed’s Fly Meat LLC, which really did seem ready to cater to just about any amphibian.
    Despicable Me review comments are mixed by some standards.
    If you aren’t listed here it doesn’t mean we didn’t think you
    had well-kept, adorable, and healthy animals.

    There are a few other subtle elements to Shoot
    - Mania that enrich the overall gameplay experience and give
    players a significant advantage when used effectively.
    Use this to your advantage and place the frosting machines, toppers, telephone, cupcakes,
    etc where it’s most convenient for your game play.

    Feel free to surf to my homepage … growtopia hack

  4. If you have been trying to promote your own web site and you have
    received traffic every hour, my hands are down for you.
    Well, those are the important fundamentals of Pai Gow Poker.
    Google and additional hunt engines have in truth ended them reimburse subsequent to
    quite a few algorythms changes like Panda and Penguin.

  5. Deer Jezse Vinturae,
    Mi Name is Raquandashanaenaebonquisha Smith IIII(4) I herd that u wus hirin exter secoority for u to becim de prezledent. i hope u doez becuz u are gut.
    thunks,
    Raquandashanaenaebonquisha Smith IIII
    (suportrer

  6. I would go nuts if I seen “Jesse Ventura, President” in the headlines! Like wishing on a star, I’d love to see a noble man rule the people and put things back in order. Despite my beliefs that the candidates and electorial college are completely rigged, I would still make every effort to see that everyone I know vote for Mr. Ventura.
    I applaud every journey he’s made to prove that there is so much the government hides from the people and puts it to shame. To me, and many others, he is a true hero.

  7. Hi Jesse- wanted to give you my sincerest Thanks and best of luck. For years, I suffered as a Targeted Individual, but thanks to your “brain invaders” video, the edge on their sword has dulled. The most painful aspect of being a T.I. is the fact we think we are crazy. Eveything those victims described I have suffered as well. The sad thing is our own police departments have access to the crumbs that use this techno. File a ‘plaint against a bad cop, you might easily become a T.I. I’m thinking of moving too another country- but all of us know we should not have to. Again, my sincerest thanks, and remember, “whatever was old it’s new” -Danny Ingamells

  8. After I initially lrft a comment I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when
    new comments are added- checkbox and now every time a comment is added I receive four emails wwith
    the exact sazme comment. Is there a means you are able to remove me from that service?
    Thankjs a lot!

    Feel free to visit my web sige :: florida stage rental

  9. I leave a response each time I especially enjoy a article
    on a blog orr I have something to add to the conversation.
    It is a result of the fire communicated in thhe article
    I looked at. And on thjs article Jesse Ventura 2016 Petition |
    Jesse Ventura .net. I waas actually moved enough to drop a thought :-P I actually do have a few questjons for you iif
    you usually do not mind. Could it be just me or does it look like some of the responses look as iif they
    are coming from brain dead people? :-P And, if you are
    writing on other online social sites, I’d like too follow
    you. Would youu make a list the complete urls of your social
    pages llike your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?

    Here is my blog post :: home and garden covington

  10. Unquestionably imagine that which you stated. Your favouritte justification seemed to be on the internet the siplest factor to remember of.
    I say to you, I certainly get irked at the same time as folks
    think about concerns that they just don’t understand about.
    You controlled to hiit the nail upon the highest and also defined out the
    whgole thing with no neerd side-effects , other folks could take a signal.

    Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

    my homepage cosmetics nyyc (Kari)

  11. Dear Mr Ventura, if you were to run for President you would have my vote. I am proud of you and your efforts to dig out the truth, especially when you are putting your own reputation on the line every time you do so. It seems so much of the time as if the truth does not matter anymore in America, it is more important how well they can twist the facts and replace them with the lie that best serves their purpose. I hope you will run for President, and I hope when you win you will make the most of that position to straighten out some of those self serving hypocrites in congress.

  12. Jesse,

    I truly hope that you will run in 2016! You have my vote!

    Two days ago my son was confronted by a security guard at a local strip mall. He was told he looked suspicious, that it was private property and that he either had to go in the store or back to his car. My son explained that I was checking out and he was waiting for me. My son decided to defuse the issue by walking down the sidewalk, the security guard then blocked his path and told him he could arrest him for tresspassing on private property. My son didn’t argue, he just returned to the store and told me about the incedent.

    I then went looking for this little thug and confronted him about his bad behavior. I requested his name, his supervisors name, and the contact phone number. He didn’t want to give me the information, but this is one American mamma you don’t want to tick off! I lodged a compliant with his superior but have not heard back from them yet on the out come (I will be following up on this).

    I have been getting pretty fired up lately about the stupidity in our government and the fact that they think they can dictate and control every aspect of our liives. They have completely overstepped their bounds!

    IT’S TIME WE TAKE OUR COUNTRY!
    Then maybe, just maybe, we can visit a mall again with out the fear of being threatend!

  13. I have Signed this 3 times with each one of my emails and ALL THREE Times My Name has not shown up on the List as Well as the Count

  14. Jesse I was army and I took that oath to protect the Constitution from all enemies Foreign and domestic. I still take that oath very seriously. If they try to take my rife they will have to pry
    it out of my cold dead hands.

  15. Detention must be based on specific, articulable facts (SAF) and rational inferences. Unparticularized suspicion and inarticulate hunches alone are not good enough. A valid investigative stop must be based on “reasonable articulable suspicion” (RAS) – U.S. v. Briggman, 931 F2d705 (1991) (Supreme Court)

    2. “Pretextual traffic stops are a violation of the 4th Amendment.” -U.S. v. Eldridge, 984 F2d 943 (1993)

    3. “Officer’s questions must relate to the purpose of the stop, or detention of driver is unreasonable.” – U.S. v. Barahona, 990 F2d (1993)

    4. “You may refuse to provide the police I.D. or information.” -U.S. V. Brown, 731 F2d 1491 (1984)

    5. “The right to privacy includes an “individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.” -Whalen v. Roe, 429 US 589 (1977)

    6. You may not be arrested solely to ascertain your identity -Arrington v. McDonald, 808 F2d 466 (1988)

    7. Your refusing consent of a search is not basis for RAS, nor Probable Cause to search or impound your vehicle. -U.S. v. Manuel, 992 F2d 272, (1993)

    8. Unless your answers to questioning provide Probable Cause, you are free to go. Once your documentation (if offered) is returned, you are free to go. – Parker v. Strong, 717 F. Supp 767 (1989)

    9. You do not have to be suspected or accused of criminal behavior to enjoy your 4th Amendments protections against unreasonable search or seizure. – U.S. v. Erickson, 991 F2d 529 (1993)

    10. Even if your vehicle is stopped legitimately, the police may not search it without probable cause (or your consent). -U.S. v. Wanless, 882 F2d 1459 (1989)

    11. A Terry Frisk (pat down search) may only be for weapons, not to reach in pockets. Officers must first believe a threat is posed. -U.S. v. Santillanes, 848 F2d 1103

    12. Government must prove alleged consent to search, and that consent was given freely and voluntarily. -U.S. v. Villareal, 963 F2d 770 (1992)

    13. Waiver of rights must be knowing and voluntary (not under threat and duress) -White v. White, 925 F2d 287 (1991)

    14. You may verbally challenge the officer’s actions or ask for his ID. -Gainor v. Roberts, 973 F2d 1379 (1992)

    15. If police falsely arrest you without Probable Cause, they have no qualified immunity. -Malley v. Briggs, 475 US 335 (1986)

    16. A Federal officer who uses excessive force acts in bad faith and may be
    resisted. -U.S. v. Span, 970 F2d 573 (1992)

    17. Police supervisors are liable if they authorize or approve unconstitutional conduct of offending officers. -White v. Farrier, 849 F2d 322, (1988)

    18. A search incident to arrest is limited to the area within your immediate control (i.e. not entire car if cuffed in the rear) – U.S. v. Vasey, 834 F2d 782, (1987)

    THE U.S. POLICE STATE – Words from Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas)
    “A police state is incompatible with liberty. A hundred years ago the federal government was responsible for enforcing very few laws. This has dramatically changed. There are now more than 3,000 federal laws and 10,000 regulations employing hundreds of thousands of bureaucrats diligently enforcing them, with over 80,000 of them carrying guns. We now have an armed national police state, just as Jefferson complained of King George in the Declaration of Independence: “He has sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.” A lot of political and police power has shifted from the state and local communities to the federal government over the past hundred years. If a constitutional republic is desired and individual liberty is cherished, this concentration of power cannot be tolerated!”

  16. All government officials and agencies, including all State legislatures, are bound by the Constitution and must NOT create any defacto laws which counter the Constitution:The U.S. Supreme Court, in 1895, ruled unconstitutional a federal law containing income taxes, Bills,statutes and codes with arguments concerning class warfare and the definition of a direct tax.”Herein…Ohio’s Doctrine of Governmental Immunity was held unconstitutional and others to numerous to mention.” (Civil Rights) (Krause vs Ohio, app 2d 1 L.N.W. 2d 321 1971.) Reich vs State Highway Dept. 336, Mich 617: 194 N.W. 2d 700 197″Employees of a city or state are not immune from suit under statute relating civil rights for deprivations of rights on ground that officials were acting within the scope of their ground that officials were acting within the Scope of their responsibilities of performing a discretionary act.” (Bunch vs Barnett 376 F.Sup. 23.)”Title 28 Section 1391, this section makes it possible to bring actions against government officials and agencies in district court outside D.C.” (Civil Rights) (Norton vs Mcshane 14 L.Ed. 2d 274.)A suit in detinue or replevin in personam should lie to gain possession of property seized by the state. (Civil Rights) Stephen, Pleading (3rd Am ed) p. 47, 52, 69, 74; Ames Lectures on legal history, p. 64, 71; Wilkins v. Despard, 5 Term Rep- 112; Roberts v. Withered, % Mod. 193, 12 Mod. 92.

    The CAFR Swindle – The Biggest Game In Town
    http://www.youtube.com
    Taxes are no longer necessary. This video exposes a deliberate and massive swindle that is perpetrated by every government agency from your local school district.

    The state government did not create the common law, so it has no authority to abolish it or control it, unless we allow ourselves to be tricked to putting common law under statutory law, where it’s “their house, their rules.” However, if we operate outside the statutory rules by invoking common law, no state government has the authority or jurisdiction to dictate, control or abolish what we do. They only have authority to enforce our decisions.

    “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof;… shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby… The Senators and Representatives and members of the State legislature, and all executive and judicial officers of the United States and the several States, shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.” The Constitution of the united States of America, Article VI, Cl 2, 3.5 U.S.C. 2906, 3331,The oath of office taken by an individual under section 3331 of this title shall be delivered by him to, and preserved by, the House of Congress, agency, or court to ..Sec. 3331-3333. Oath of office – Subchapter II – Oath of Office – U.S. Code – Title 5: Government Organization and Employees – January 01, 2011 – Order: 2 – 19265805 …To protect the people from their elected and public employees,,Many of our people seem to believe that their state government has jurisdiction to stop the common law Grand Juries. However,the state government only has authority over statutory (ie. State) law, not common law. The common law of England was used to establish the U.S. Constitution, so it existed before it and, thus, it is superior to it. The common law is time immemorial.

    If the U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged the authority of the common law Grand Jury (U.S. v. Williams), why would the state have authority to counter that opinion? The common law is superior to all statutory law, and we must only invoke it in the right way to have superior standing. We need to stop
    putting the common law and the Grand Juries underneath their inferior statutory laws. The people (singular AND plural) have the ultimate authority!18 USC § 2381 – Treason | Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal … http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381
    … is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; …

    “The United States is entirely a creature of the Constitution. Its power and authority have no other source. It can only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the Constitution.” Reid v Covert 354 US l, 1957.

    Any laws created by government which are repugnant to the Constitution carry NO force of law and are VOID:An unconstitutional law states and codes cannot operate to supersede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (the Constitution JTM) it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” Bonnett v. Vallier, 116 N.W. 885, 136 Wis. 193 (1908); NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425 (1886). See also Bonnett v Vallier, 136 Wis 193, 200; 116 NW 885, 887 (1908); State ex rel Ballard v Goodland, 159 Wis 393, 395; 150 NW 488, 489 (1915); State ex rel Kleist v Donald, 164 Wis 545, 552-553; 160 NW 1067, 1070 (1917); State ex rel Martin v Zimmerman, 233 Wis 16, 21; 288 NW 454, 457 (1939); State ex rel Commissioners of Public Lands v Anderson, 56 Wis 2d 666, 672; 203 NW2d 84, 87 (1973); and Butzlaffer v Van Der Geest & Sons, Inc, Wis, 115 Wis 2d 539; 340 NW2d 742, 744-745 (1983).

  17. “The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute and codes, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since its unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment… In legal contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed… Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it… A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. 20.181-192United States Code: Title 28a,Rule 5.1. Constitutional … http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28a/usc_sec_28a... Cached42 USC 1986 provides: 42 USC 1986 provides: Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in the preceding section (1985 of Title 42) are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful act, neglect, or refusal, may be joined as defendants in the action. (Civil Rights)Mandatory Reporting laws Applier’s Elected and public employees and commercial contractors

    Defendants can be held in actions under 42 USC 1983, even,This includes Elected and public employees,Effective January 1, 2013, employees of Oregon higher education institutions are considered by law to be subject mandatory reporters of child abuse.http://www.oregon.gov/dhs/abuse/pages/mr_employees.aspx
    though they did not act willfully. Even though they did not have a specific intent to deprive the plaintiff of a federal right, such defendants can be held to civil responsibility. Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.s. 167, 1961.24.215-219, the assaults on this man or reported again
    An conspiracy is actionable under 42 USC 1985, when there has been an “actual of denial of due process.”(Civil Rights) Jennings v. Nester (1954, Ca. 7 Ill.) 217, F.2d 153, CERT DEN 349 U.S. 958, 99 L.Ed. 1281, 75 S.ct. 888.”Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void;” and the courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v Madison, 5 US 1803 (2 Cranch) 137, 170?180, and NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425.

    “When an act of the legislature is repugnant or contrary to the constitution, it is, ipso facto, void.” 2 Pet. R. 522; 12 Wheat. 270; 3 Dall. 286; 4 Dall. 18.

    “[p]owers not granted (to any government) are prohibited.” United States v. Butler, 297 U.S 1, 68 (1936).43.359-365
    Purpose: Generally, this section further protects civil action for deprivation of rights protects constitutional rights from invasion by persons acting under state or federal authority. (Civil Rights) Weise v. Reisner, DC Wis. 1970, 318 F.Sup. 580, quoted from U.S.C.A. 1972 pocketpart, P. 40 Title 42, Sec. 1983, Note Paragraph 8,,,,,.
    “Liability in damages for unconstitutional or otherwise illegal conduct has the very desirable effect of deterring such conduct. Indeed, this was precisely the proposition upon which 42 USC section 1983 was enacted.” ‘” “Judges may be punished criminally for willful deprivations of constitutional right on the strength of 18 USC Section 241- 242.” (Civil Rights) (Imbler vs Pachtman, U.S. 47 L.Ed. 2nd 128, 96 S.Ct.)

    44.367-374
    This section was passed to enforce U.S.C.A. Constitution Amendment 14 and to protect form interference the rights secured thereby, as well as other constitutional rights; it is directed against conspiracies of private persons; and there is no requirement that conspiracy be under color of law. (Civil Rights) U.S.C.A. 1972 Pocket P. 1675, Title 42, Sec. 1995, Note
    28.242-248
    The Seventh Circuit of Appeals has held that a public official does not have immunity simply because he operates in a discretionary situation. It indicated that public servants are to be held liable when they abused their discretion or acted in a way that is arbitrary, fanciful, or clearly unreasonable. (Civil Rights) Littleton v. Berbling (1972, Ca. 7 Ill.), 468 F.2d 389.36.304-308 Governmental immunity is not defense in suits brought under this section making liable every person who under color or state law deprives another person of his civil rights. Westberry v. Fisher, DC Me., 1970, 309 F.Sup. 95.18 USC § 2381 – Treason | Title 18 241-242- Crimes and Criminal …www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381 Cached
    … is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; ..
    Common-Law Grand-Juries”.Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition Attorney General… “He is the chief law officer of the federal and state governments with the duty of representing the sovereign, national or state. Johnson v. Commonwealth, ex rel. Meredith, 291 Ky. 829, 165 S.W.2d 820, 826.”
    “Insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (constitution) it is superseded thereby.” (16 Am Jur 2d 177, Late Am Jur 2d. 256)

  18. Supreme courts ruled “Without Corpus delicti there can be no crime”“In every prosecution for crime it is necessary to establish the “corpus delecti”, i.e., the body or elements of the crime.” People v. Lopez, 62 Ca.Rptr. 47, 254 C.A.2d 185.

    “In every criminal trial, the prosecution must prove the corpus delecti, or the body of the crime itself-i.e., the fact of injury, loss or harm, and the existence of a criminal agency as its cause. ” People v. Sapp, 73 P.3d 433, 467 (Cal. 2003) [quoting People v. Alvarez, (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1161, 1168-1169, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 903, 46 P.3d 372.].

    “As a general principal, standing to invoke the judicial process requires an actual justiciable controversy as to which the complainant has a real interest in the ultimate adjudication because he or she has either suffered or is about to suffer an injury. ” People v. Superior Court, 126 Cal.Rptr.2d 793.

    “Without standing, there is no actual or justiciable controversy, and courts will not entertain such cases. (3 Witlen, Cal. Procedure (3rd ed. 1985) Actions § 44, pp 70-72.) “Typically, … the standing inquiry requires careful judicial examination of a complaint’s allegations to ascertain whether the particular plaintiff is entitled to an adjudication of the particular claims asserted. ” (Allen v. Wright, (1984) 468 U.S. 737, 752…Whether one has standing in a particular case generally revolved around the question whether that person has rights that may suffer some injury, actual or threatened. ” Clifford S. v. Superior Court, 45 Cal.Rptr.2d 333, 335. Superior Court, 126 Cal.Rptr.2d 793.

    “Without standing, there is no actual or justiciable controversy, and courts will not entertain such cases. (3 Witlen, Cal. Procedure (3rd ed. 1985) Actions § 44, pp 70-72.) “Typically, … the standing inquiry requires careful judicial examination of a complaint’s allegations to ascertain whether the particular plaintiff is entitled to an adjudication of the particular claims asserted. ” (Allen v. Wright, (1984) 468 U.S. 737, 752…Whether one has standing in a particular case generally revolved around the question whether that person has rights that may suffer some injury, actual or threatened. ” Clifford S. v. Superior Court, 45 Cal.Rptr.2d 333, 335.

    “The fact is, property is a tree; income is the fruit; labour is a tree; income the fruit; capital, the tree; income the ‘fruit.’ The fruit, if not consumed (severed) as fast as it ripens, will germinate from the seed… and will produce other trees and grow into more property; but so long as it is fruit merely, and plucked (severed) to eat… it is no tree, and will produce itself no fruit.” Waring v. City of Savennah. 60 Ga. 93, 100 (1878.}

    The Clearfield Doctrine,,,http://www.scribd.com/doc/96926258/The-Clearfield-Doctrine
    Clearfield Doctrine proves when governments descend to the corporate level they CEASE to be governmental entities.Clearfield DoctrineIt is well settled that an officer must be either elected, appointed or commissioned. Employees cannot be made officers “by virtueof their employment.” Even if they could, I.C. 59
    -703 (9) states,
    “”Public office” means any position in which the normal and usual duties are conducted on behalf of a governmental entity.”

    The righReadingnd freedom listened
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnUKzJzdw_Y&feature=share…Continue Reading

    Why was Christmas banned in America until 1820?
    youtube.com
    What is the real spirit behind Christmas? What does the tree represent and why do we decorate it and place gifts underneath it? Why have we been Why was Christmas banned in America until 1820? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZAL80TMLa

  19. ..all laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void’ (Marbury v Madison, 5 US 1803 (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 170).

    “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” – Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.

    “The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.

    “There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights.”- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.

    To disregard Constitutional law, and to violate the same, creates a sure liability upon the one involved:

    “State officers may be held personally liable for damages based upon actions taken in their official capacities.” Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991).

    I have a right to question and challenge any Publicly owned taxing activities by Any Public court, their Elected and public employee government,,non-for profits and any affiliates agency as to their validity and legal standing:

    “Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of limitations upon his authority.” The United States Supreme Court, Federal Crop Ins. Corp, v. Merrill, 332 US 380-388 L1947)

    “The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. United States Supreme Court reminds us in Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906):

    “The legal right of an individual to decrease or ALTOGETHER AVOID his/her taxes by means which the law permits cannot be doubted” –Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465

    There can be no sanction or penalty imposed on one because of this Constitutional right.” Sherer v. Cullen 481 F. 945:

  20. “Detention must be based on specific, articulable facts (SAF) and rational inferences. Unparticularized suspicion and inarticulate hunches alone are not good enough. A valid investigative stop must be based on “reasonable articulable suspicion” (RAS) – U.S. v. Briggman, 931 F2d705 (1991) (Supreme Court)

    2. “Pretextual traffic stops are a violation of the 4th Amendment.” -U.S. v. Eldridge, 984 F2d 943 (1993)

    3. “Officer’s questions must relate to the purpose of the stop, or detention of driver is unreasonable.” – U.S. v. Barahona, 990 F2d (1993)

    4. “You may refuse to provide the police I.D. or information.” -U.S. V. Brown, 731 F2d 1491 (1984)

    5. “The right to privacy includes an “individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.” -Whalen v. Roe, 429 US 589 (1977)

    6. You may not be arrested solely to ascertain your identity -Arrington v. McDonald, 808 F2d 466 (1988)

    7. Your refusing consent of a search is not basis for RAS, nor Probable Cause to search or impound your vehicle. -U.S. v. Manuel, 992 F2d 272, (1993)

    8. Unless your answers to questioning provide Probable Cause, you are free to go. Once your documentation (if offered) is returned, you are free to go. – Parker v. Strong, 717 F. Supp 767 (1989)

    9. You do not have to be suspected or accused of criminal behavior to enjoy your 4th Amendments protections against unreasonable search or seizure. – U.S. v. Erickson, 991 F2d 529 (1993)

    10. Even if your vehicle is stopped legitimately, the police may not search it without probable cause (or your consent). -U.S. v. Wanless, 882 F2d 1459 (1989)

    11. A Terry Frisk (pat down search) may only be for weapons, not to reach in pockets. Officers must first believe a threat is posed. -U.S. v. Santillanes, 848 F2d 1103

    12. Government must prove alleged consent to search, and that consent was given freely and voluntarily. -U.S. v. Villareal, 963 F2d 770 (1992)

    13. Waiver of rights must be knowing and voluntary (not under threat and duress) -White v. White, 925 F2d 287 (1991)

    14. You may verbally challenge the officer’s actions or ask for his ID. -Gainor v. Roberts, 973 F2d 1379 (1992)

    15. If police falsely arrest you without Probable Cause, they have no qualified immunity. -Malley v. Briggs, 475 US 335 (1986)

    16. A Federal officer who uses excessive force acts in bad faith and may be
    resisted. -U.S. v. Span, 970 F2d 573 (1992)

    17. Police supervisors are liable if they authorize or approve unconstitutional conduct of offending officers. -White v. Farrier, 849 F2d 322, (1988)

    18. A search incident to arrest is limited to the area within your immediate control (i.e. not entire car if cuffed in the rear) – U.S. v. Vasey, 834 F2d 782, (1987)

    THE U.S. POLICE STATE – Words from Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas)
    “A police state is incompatible with liberty. A hundred years ago the federal government was responsible for enforcing very few laws. This has dramatically changed. There are now more than 3,000 federal laws and 10,000 regulations employing hundreds of thousands of bureaucrats diligently enforcing them, with over 80,000 of them carrying guns. We now have an armed national police state, just as Jefferson complained of King George in the Declaration of Independence: “He has sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.” A lot of political and police power has shifted from the state and local communities to the federal government over the past hundred years. If a constitutional republic is desired and individual liberty is cherished, this concentration of power cannot be tole

  21. NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT

    WARNING:____________________________________________ (Public Utility Company)

    Address:___________________________________________________________________

    Re: account number: #_________________________________

    You are suspected of alleged CONSPIRACY, COERCION, EMBEZZLEMENT, THEFT BY DECEPTION, EXTORTION, MAIL FRAUD, CREATION OF CONVERTIBLE FRAUDULENT DEBT, MONEY-LAUNDERING AND FAILING TO DISCHARGE PEOPLE’S DEBTS PURSUANT TO:

    1. 73RD CONGRESS. SESS 1. CHS. 48 49. JUNE 5, 6,1933 HJR 192

    2. HR 1491 PUBLIC LAW 1 48 STAT 1

    3. US CODE – SEC 1956

    4. PUBLIC LAW 10 CHAPTER 48 STAT 112

    5. PUBLIC LAW 73-10 40 STAT 411

    6. TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT (TWEA) OCT 6, 1917

    1) Affiant has no record or evidence that House Joint Resolution 192 (HJR 192) (Public law 7310), passed in 1933, did not declare all “debt” against the law while the US was in bankruptcy or state of emergency;

    HJR 192: (a) “Every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payments in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy; and no such provision shall be contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred… Any such provision contained in any law authorizing obligations to be issued by or under authority of the United States, is hereby repealed.”

    and he believes no such evidence exists.

    2) Affiant has no record or evidence that, because all real property and gold was seized by the US government as collateral in the Bankruptcy Act of 1933, there exists “like-kind” currency for which one could lawfully pay a “debt” with, and he believes no such evidence exists.

    3) Affiant has no record or evidence all that attempting to “pay” a debt in the US would not be against the law according to above posted HJR 192, because all debts made after the date of the resolution were to be discharged, and he believes no such evidence exists.

    Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition:

    DISCHARGE: “To cancel or unloose the obligation of the contract.”

    4) Affiant has no record or evidence that the Lieber Code or General Order 100, was not created by Abraham Lincoln in 1863 to establish emergency laws when the US is under emergency status and that the US has been and remains in emergency status since the Bankruptcy Act of 1933 and this status has been re-ratified numerous times by numerous presidents since and as recently as March 6, 2014 by President Obama, and he believes no such evidence exists.

    Lieber Code Art. 31:

    “A victorious army appropriates all public money, seizes all public movable property until further direction by its government”

    5) Affiant has no record or evidence that this utility company is not considered a “Public” utility and therefor a US Agency created to serve the people’s intrinsic need of this critical service and that Agency costs to operate are reimbursed through the Comptroller of the Currency, the US Treasury or other similar government agency, and that all these costs have been PREPAID by the PEOPLE and each customer is entitled by virtue of the surrender of all real property and money in 1933, to discharge the amounts of his needs in accordance with the US Bankruptcy Act and House Joint Resolution 192, and he believes no such evidence exists.

    6) Affiant has no record or evidence that Legal Tender is required to settle funds owed based on these matters of case law;

    (a) Baltimore and Ohio R.R. v State 36 Md. 591 (1872). “As of October 27, 1977, legal tender for discharge of debt is no longer required. That is because legal tender is not in circulation at par with promises to pay credit. There can be no requirement of repayment in legal tender, since legal tender was not loaned, nor in circulation and repayment, or payment, and need only be made in equivalent kind,; a negotiable instrument.”

    (b) UCC 3-603 Clarification. “If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is refused, there is discharge, to the extent of the amount of the tender…”

    (c) OREGON UCC ORS 81.010 “Effect of unaccepted offer in writing to pay or deliver. An offer in writing to pay a particular sum of money, or deliver a written instrument or specific personal property is, if not accepted, equivalent to the actual production and tender of the

    money, instrument or property.” (This statute operates in other states via the rule of Para Materia.)

    and he believes no such evidence exists.

    7) Affiant has no record or evidence this utility company did not knowingly send Affiant “Statements” or “Invoices”, purporting the authentic requirement of “payment” to settle “Amount Due”, “Total Due”, or using similar wording, rather than sending a TRUE BILL in COMMERCE, to cleverly misrepresent amount as Affiant’s legal obligation to PAY under threat of the cancellation of this basic human need utility, and lawfully should have been notices of Dividends to Affiant, which may constitute Convertible Fraud, and he believes no such evidence exists.

    8) Affiant has no record or evidence this utility company has not knowingly sent Affiant STATEMENTS purporting the authentic requirement of payment to settle “Amount Due”, “Total Due”, or using similar wording rather than TRUE BILL in COMMERCE, to cleverly represent this amount as Affiant’s legal obligation to PAY under threat of the cancellation of this basic human need utility through the US Postal Service, which may constitute Mail Fraud, and he believes no such evidence exists.

    9) Affiant has no record or evidence this Public Utility Company has not failed to pay down the public debt and chosen to unlawfully redirect ill-gotten gains into private corporate accounts through embezzlement or, theft by deception or, fraudulent conversion, and he believes no such evidence exists.

    10) Affiant has no record or evidence that Comptroller of The Currency at all levels, US Treasury, Judges, Bar Lawyers and many of our representatives in various office do not clearly understand all of the above claims to be irrefutable fact, which may constitute Conspiracy against the people, and he believes no such evidence exists.

    11) Affiant has no record or evidence Public Utility Company was not properly Noticed herein that all future demands from Affiant must be in the form of a TRUE BILL in COMMERCE, inclusive of wet ink signature from an Authorized Agent of company under penalty of perjury, stating that this is not a PUBLIC Utility Company and the debt

    you are claiming payment for is not the responsibility of any US agency to discharge on behalf of Affiant, and he believes no such evidence exists.

    12) Affiant has no record or evidence all future debts shall not be charged off on his behalf by Public Utility Company, when Affiant upon receipt of “Statement”, “Invoice” or other counterfeit BILL, writes across the payment demand on a forty-five degree angle ”Accepted For Value” value shown as due, signs the bottom of the same instrument, places his EIN number (Social Security Number minus the dashes) next to it, dates it and returns it, in light of Virginia Code: §46-3-603. Tender of payment;

    (a) “If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument, the effect of tender is governed by principles of law applicable to tender of payment under a simple contract.”

    (b) “If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is refused, there is discharge, to the extent of the amount of the tender, of the obligation of an indorser or accommodation party having a right of recourse with respect to the obligation to which the tender relates.”

    and believes no such evidence exists.

    13) Affiant has no record or evidence Public Utility Company shall not at this time, perform a thorough audit of its files to identify all legal tender Affiant has in good faith submitted to company in belief it to be justly due Company, and shall, upon finding that any legal tender has been submitted to the same through coercion, fraud or other illegal representation or means, return full amount back to Affiant immediately , and he believes no such evidence exists.

    14) If you believe any claim made in this affidavit untrue, each individual claim shall be addressed on a point-by-point basis with clear supporting evidence for each rebuttal by your Authorized Agent in sworn Affidavit form within 10 business days of receipt of this NOTICE. Failure to respond will establish your agreement that all claims made herein are true and correct and your acceptance of these terms. Rebuttal of any claim proving true shall not be construed to affect any other claim herein, nor cause any of this instrument to be invalid other than that specific claim, nor cancel the intent of instrument for full refund of legal tender submitted and all future discharge of debt invoiced.

    United States v. Kis, 658 F.2°d, 526, 536 (7t Cir. 1981)

    “Indeed, no more than (affidavits) is necessary to make the prima facie case.”

    Authorized representative for

    Account(s);_______________________________________________

    All rights expressly reserved UCC1-308

    By:_________________________________

    Executor Office

    William Russell,—-, Lastname, Estate

    Nation California.

    [210] East Battles Road General Delivery

    Santa Maria. Lastname Province.

    United States Minor, Outlying Islands.

    Near [93454]

    [805.931.5555]

    JURAT

    State of

    County of

    Sworn and subscribed (or affirmed) before me on this_____ day of

    ______________________,

    20______

    by_______________________________________________________________,

    proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.

    seal

    _________________________

    Notary Public

    My Commission Expires _______________
    2

  22. When the Oregon supreme court Struck a Unlawful Administrating Bill Statue are State County or City this down in Violation of are state life liberty and the pursuit of Happiness For Lawful Americans. It this to Apply to all
    lawful Americans, The British Foreign invasion of unlawful Admitting Attorneys for the state Defacto Senators and house members Attempt to Bring it back for a new piracy funding Bill to lawful Americans to justify their Assets and personal Spawning unlawful Statues and Codes Nazi new Democracy Of Unlawful Family’s, Member’s and Police,Sheriff Judges and Senators and House members County and City servants Slander An who Stand by and watch Lawful Americans Get an their Horrific home invasion on the Innocent Family’s to Rape ,Rob, Commit Piracy all in the name of Romans 11; Romans 12; Romans 13 – New International Version http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+13&version=NIV

    Submission to the Authorities 1 Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established.

  23. , Called a Birth Certificate and local water and food bonds. ,Also May Not know a Bill to the Elected and public servants Treaty with the British, 1776- 1866 Civil Rights laws, , As Supreme Court has stated many time over Statutes and State county and city codes don’t Apply to lawful Americans.This Dose not apply to lawful Americans under the 1866 Civil rights With the British, The North Against the British South.. …Oregon state Supreme Court Member This is including the Oregon state Capital Senate and house legal team committing Piracy on all Of U.S. The Unlawful British court system of Maritime unlawfulness Committing Piracy on you and you children, Give bad advice and bribe they Attorneys and Possible some unlawful Judicial Administration and memebers./. to the House and senators to pass funding bills for programs, Drug and Alcohol Fraud, School Counseling Fraud, Family Concealing Piracy of ones Fourth Amendment who Have not Committed Crime Against one Family members., Because of your Brainwashing yourself for personal greed and the next Judge, Attorney, Unlawfully precinct captain,Non-for Profit, Church, School Bake sale For overly paid Babysitters that Dumb down mans Castle Children As he Dose not take the time for his own Children. An for those who your Children wont nothing to do you you Because your Sold Your Souls To the unlawful And Voluntary Tax man the Root of All Evil your Personally GREED At your Children Birth Certificate The Devil’s Contract of Freedom I Claim Mine This is way My Mother and Father, Toledo City,Mayor, City council members, My Democratic Neighbored along with my parents made so many false police reports on my They Destroyed My Life liberty and pursuit of Happiness, Having a Family to raise and be Proud because they new What Life liberty and the pursuit of Happiness is All About When you know the Children You Raised were Self Reliant to be free thinking and most of all know what life liberty and the pursuit of Substance hunting and food gathering know what Gad and Mother Earth proved for them and the children’s children’s, A Pride American Bloodline Bass on the Garden of Eden, and most of all did not Sign there live of the the Devil’s Contractors you know the Names of the Democratic of Democracy Courts Members of the unlawful Foreign Agents Piracy,Maritime Courts on American Soil in Violation of the Treaty Every constitutional Territory Has included thy Oath Of Office that they were to Receive Con With The British Federal Unlawful Courts,. So many are Upset Senator and House Member’s For not protecting The united states and are own Oregon Territory,, Protecting Lawful Americans From invasion from foreign and Domestic Invades that Violate the Constitutional laws title 5 USC 2906-3331-3333,Title 18 241-242 , that the have Created so many different agency and non for profits and Churches to come an Pray too.to have Lawful Americans running around with their of publicly Employees servants , .,Real American’s Freedom

    oregontrackers.com/ Americans%20Freedom.html
    Back to Oregontrackers.com …
    My God I Believe in Is Merciful, Kind, Caring thinking, Will not tell other how to live, No Victim No Crime. Man has the right to Defend his home and asset and his Neighborhoods from the Devil’s Democracy who you Gather because in my Case I will not Sign my rights over to Anyone one or Doctor Elected and public servants agency’s without others permission Liberty, Educates other with out the fees of the devil’s root of all Evil paper, Works with the pursuit of Happiness Substance hunting and food Gathering on our lawful; American public Lands high-ways,byways and water ways including Marshes including going to The Commercial Markets with out the invasion of illegal and Foreign agents and Foreign for profit and lawful American right to Feed one family’s Including all Fisheries, Medicinal use Forest God and Mother Earth given life Greens, He Cares for he’s fellowman.. As it is up to man To take care of man, An Not have to be force to Except they wrong doing of others. Man dose not have too Exempt the lawless of man to commit piracy on he’s home, and family..More later.

  24. Wonderful site you have here but I was wanting to know if you knew of any user
    discussion forums that cover the same topics discussed in this
    article? I’d really love to be a part of online community where I can get
    feedback from other knowledgeable people that share the same interest.
    If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Bless you!

  25. Never have i voted for the better of two evils. IE: never voted for a presidential candidate.
    This is the only time in my life i would vote up to now. If not we are doomed anyway. Does anyone even think our country/planet could survive another obama, or bush?

  26. We need you Jesse, the ball may have been slow getting going, but it’s gonna knock them all down. You are saying and doing the stuff of heroes. This dialogue is also needed, thank you and I want to help you win, so when the money’s needed, the two of us will send $50 dollars each. Let us know.
    God Bless You!

  27. Hey, I’m from Finland. Too bad I can’t sign the petition. Conspiracy theories season 2 is has been airing in Finland since last year and I am hooked. I can’t believe everything in the show would be true, but the unwillingness of the officials when interviewed do seem to make a strong statement. Plus the fact it’s been blocked from airing in America.

    I hope for all the best for this project and please, please get the grass roots movement going. It would be the greatest thing since 1776 and for democracy like Mr. Ventura said. I beleive it can be done. Because if Obama can win the 1st round then so can Jesse! I’ll try to support these websites through Pay Pal if I can.

  28. Street Meet

    February 28, 2014

    I have written several times in regards to my concern about civil liberties. Assumed, caught in a conspiracy theory, plots led by the Department of Defense (DOD). I have written in regards to RFID’s (devices) and the capacity of satellites being used as space weapons. I am concerned that police states are being established, but that the warning of martial law may interfere with our national freedom. Please investigate the laws that are being pacified without the general public awareness of the military agenda. Why are the politicians ignoring that the citizens of the United States civil liberties are being infringed upon.

    Are you familiar with New World Order? What is it and what are the politicians doing to lobby against executive order?
    Where are the people who are actively trying to protect human, civil and constitutional rights? Contact information, iratlift@yahoo.com and/or 678-334-3409

    Irene Ratliff

  29. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I
    could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter updates.
    I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this for quite some time and was hoping
    maybe you would have some experience with something
    like this. Please let me know if you run into anything.

    I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look
    forward to your new updates.

  30. It would be a great thing if you could look into the port Arthur massacre in Australia. Might ruffle a few feathers tho. Check it out on YouTube if u havnt seen it already. All the best with the campaign.

  31. Chaleur et confort sont les deux mots d’ordres pour passer un hiver agréable !
    Être habillé chaudement tout en préservant la facilité de mouvements pour être à l’aise dans ses vêtements, voilà ce que
    nous recherchons pour la plupart.

  32. please do a story about the corruption in the Louisiana justice system Louisiana and Orgeon or the only to state that can convicted people to life in prison with a hung jury for most state But these two states you needed 3 Jurors to have a hung jury in other states you only needed 1person. please read story done by Cindy Chang a report from The TimePicayune.She state Louisiana has the largest prison system do the corruption becausecit private own and not state run So it a numbers game not about justice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>